I like Google+ as all things Google are just awesome.
However, I use Google+ now just for the content as I can always find something good there to read.
As for the links on a Google+ profile tab, they were (at one time) do follow. From what I've read recently, they are all no follow now. However, you are welcome to test this out for yourself.
Google has done the same to Youtube links.
I'm sure the reason being, Google got tired of spammers creating profiles just for backlinking.
Youtube links are no follow now. If you know differently, please say so.I like Google+ as all things Google are just awesome. :p
However, I use Google+ now just for the content as I can always find something good there to read.
As for the links on a Google+ profile tab, they were (at one time) do follow. From what I've read recently, they are all no follow now. However, you are welcome to test this out for yourself.
Google has done the same to Youtube links.
I'm sure the reason being, Google got tired of spammers creating profiles just for backlinking.
Youtube links are no follow now. If you know differently, please say so.
@ppscslv I am not a parrot, work in internet for 5 years with different websites, forums and etc,
I know twitter works good, But I have notice recent improvement of SEO associted with G+ works,
It is usually said that google do not give priority to their service in page ranking and etc,
But my blogger pages works better than wordpress and other blogs even with very low facilities@[USER=6836]ppscslv[/USER] I am not a parrot, work in internet for 5 years with different websites, forums and etc,
I know twitter works good, But I have notice recent improvement of SEO associted with G+ works,
It is usually said that google do not give priority to their service in page ranking and etc,
But my blogger pages works better than wordpress and other blogs even with very low facilities
I wonder why Google+ seems not to be moving with activity. At first, I thought that Google+ is a pretender to the throne of Facebook but it’s not. Anyway, Twitter is potent with the spreading of short messages although lately, I think it had expanded the length of the message from 160 characters to more than 200. From what I have been reading, Google+ is more for the serious users unlike Twitter which is a mix of users from the young to the old. My vote goes to Twitter.I wonder why Google+ seems not to be moving with activity. At first, I thought that Google+ is a pretender to the throne of Facebook but it’s not. Anyway, Twitter is potent with the spreading of short messages although lately, I think it had expanded the length of the message from 160 characters to more than 200. From what I have been reading, Google+ is more for the serious users unlike Twitter which is a mix of users from the young to the old. My vote goes to Twitter.
Beverly
However, I use Google+ now just for the content as I can always find something good there to read.
As for the links on a Google+ profile tab, they were (at one time) do follow. From what I've read recently, they are all no follow now. However, you are welcome to test this out for yourself.
Google has done the same to Youtube links.
I'm sure the reason being, Google got tired of spammers creating profiles just for backlinking.
Youtube links are no follow now. If you know differently, please say so. I like Google+ as all things Google are just awesome. :p However, I use Google+ now just for the content as I can always find something good there to read. As for the links on a Google+ profile tab, they were (at one time) do follow. From what I've read recently, they are all no follow now. However, you are welcome to test this out for yourself. Google has done the same to Youtube links. I'm sure the reason being, Google got tired of spammers creating profiles just for backlinking. Youtube links are no follow now. If you know differently, please say so.
Are you sure you want to delete this post?